Instructor:
Jenn Riley
jenlrile@indiana.edu
856-5759
Office hours by appointment
Course overview
This course is intended for students and individuals interested in pursuing careers in archives and special collections, students interested in digital libraries or metadata, or for individuals looking to gain a new set of skills. Students will learn about the development of the standard, the language powering it (XML), implementation, research, and future trends.
During class periods students will participate in individual, graded, mark-up exercises. Since we meet only six times attendance will be mandatory and will be figured into the final grade. Also prior to each class students will be required to turn in brief journal entries via e-mail to the instructors commenting on the weeks required readings. If you are unable to attend a class please inform the instructors prior to the class period so arrangements for the missed assignments can be made.
During the course of the workshop, students will progressively encode a larger finding aid for weekly assignments and a final project grade. In addition to the main encoding assignments there will be one group presentation of about 15-20 minutes in length on an EAD consortium group assigned by the instructors. Individual students will be asked to prepare questions in advance for each group presentation. Participation and attendance will be factored into the final grade.
Prerequisite: either S581 Archives and Records Management (formerly L516, Intro to Archives and Records Management), or S584 Manuscripts (formerly L586, Administration of Manuscripts and Personal Papers Collections). The EAD markup language for archival finding aids draws its structure and terminology directly from archival descriptive practices which are introduced in the prerequisite courses. Success in this course will depend heavily on understaning the tenets of archival description, such as provenance and original order, and the terminology used in the field. Students who have not taken one of the prerequisite courses will be required to complete an extra assignment in this course.
Course readings: are generally available through IU Libraries online journal subscriptions. When this is not the case, readings are available through the E-Reserves system. In addition, two books are on reserve for this course:
- Dooley, Jackie M. ed. Encoded Archival Description: Context, Theory, and Case Studies. Chicago : Society of American Archivists, 1998. This volume is a compendium of all articles in v. 60, no. 3/4 of the American Archivist, and is an alternate method of obtaining these articles.
- Society of American Archivists. Describing Archives: A Content Standard. Chicago : Society of American Archivists, 2007. EAD created during this course should use DACS as a content standard.
Late Submissions
Late assignments will not be accepted. If you foresee any problems with turning in an assignment by the due date, please contact the instructor prior to the due date to discuss options.
Assignments and grading
Attendance and participation: 10%
Students will be expected to participate in class at each session by contributing to the conversation based on the weekly readings and being engaged with the lecture portion of class.
Weekly journal: 20%
Each week students will be asked to make weekly journal entries based on that week's required readings. These entries should summarize and provide an original reaction to each of the required readings, and should document one or two questions to bring to the class discussion.
Group presentation: 10%
In week 6, students will give a group presentation evaluating a consortium EAD project. The presentation should be approximately 15-20 minutes in length. The instructor will provide the websites to be evaluated.
Ongoing in-class assignment, encoding finding aid 1: 15%
During weeks 1, 2, and 3, students will complete in-class encoding exercises to learn EAD markup concepts in preparation for completing homework. In-class exercises are due by the end of the class session in which they are assigned.
Homework, encoding finding aids: 45%
During the course of the workshop, students will work progressively on encoding three complete finding aids provided by the instructor. The finding aid will be turned in periodically, to show continuous encoding progress.
Grades:
| The following definitions of letter grades have been defined by student and faculty members of the Curriculum Steering Committee and have been approved by the faculty as an aid in evaluation of academic performance and to assist students by giving them an understanding of the grading standards of the School of Library and Information Science. |
| A |
4.0 |
Outstanding achievement. Student performance demonstrates full command of the course materials and evinces a high level of originality and/or creativity that far surpasses course expectations. |
| A- |
3.7 |
Excellent achievement. Student performance demonstrates thorough knowledge of the course materials and exceeds course expectations by completing all requirements in a superior manner. |
| B+ |
3.3 |
Very good work. Student performance demonstrates above-average comprehension of the course materials and exceeds course expectations on all tasks as defined in the course syllabus. |
| B |
3.0 |
Student performance meets designated course expectations and demonstrates understanding of the course materials at an acceptable level. |
| B- |
2.7 |
Marginal work. Student performance demonstrates incomplete understanding of course materials. |
C+ C |
2.3 2.0 |
Unsatisfactory work. Student performance demonstrates incomplete and inadequate understanding of course materials. |
C-
D+
D
D-
|
1.7
1.3
1.0
0.7
|
Unacceptable work. Coursework performed at this level will not count toward the MLS or MIS degree. For the course to count toward the degree, the student must repeat the course with a passing grade. |
| F |
0.0 |
Failing. Student may continue in program only with permission of the Dean. |
Academic Honesty
This course will follow Indiana University and School of Library and Information Science policies on academic dishonesty. Students found to be engaging in plagiarism, cheating, and other types of dishonesty will receive an F for the course. For further information, please see the Code of Student Ethics.
Useful Resources
Pages to bookmark and use:
Course Schedule
Session 1: Why We Do EAD: The History and Context of Encoded Archival Description (May 6)
Topics covered:
- Review of tenets of archival description (Guest lecturer: Dina Kellams, University Archives)
- Why the archival community developed EAD (Guest lecturer: Dina Kellams, University Archives)
- Benefits of structural markup over presentational markup
- Introduction to XML, DTDs, and Schemas
- Basic structure of EAD
- <archdesc> and <descgrp> in detail
- Structural markup available throughout EAD
In-class exercises:
- Learning to use the <oXygen /> XML editor
- Become familiar with the EAD Tag Library
- Finding aid 1: encode <archdesc> and <descgrp>
Assignments:
- Journal entry for Week 1 and Week 2 required readings
- Finding aid 2: encode <archdesc> and <descgrp>
- Finding aid 3: encode <archdesc> and <descgrp>
Required readings:
- Pitti, Daniel (November 1999). "Encoded Archival Description: An Introduction and Overview," D-Lib Magazine 5(11). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november99/11pitti.html.
- Kiesling, Kris (Summer 1997). "EAD as an Archival Descriptive Standard," American Archivist, v. 60, n. 3/4, pp. 344-354. Also available in Encoded Archival Description: Context, Theory, and Case Studies, pp. 81-92. In course e-reserves.
- EAD Application Guidelines, Section 3.4, Understanding Multilevel Description. (No journal entry required)
Recommended readings:
- Development of the EAD DTD
- Pitti, Daniel, "Encoded Archival Description: Development of an Encoding Standard for Archival Finding Aids." American Archivist, v. 60, n. 3/4, pp. 268-283. Also available in Encoded Archival Description: Context, Theory, and Case Studies, pp. 7-22.
Session 2: How We Do EAD (May 13)
Topics covered:
- Administrative considerations for adopting EAD
- Review of IU Archives collection processing form and EAD template
- The role of DACS and other content standards
- EAD creation methods
- Intellectual vs. physical structure in EAD
- EAD elements for folder list encoding
In-class exercises:
- Finding aid 1: encode folder list
Assignments:
- Journal entry for Week 3 required readings
- Finding aid 2: encode folder list
- Finding aid 3: encode folder list
Required readings:
- Fox, Michael (Summer 1997). "Implementing Encoded Archival Description: An Overview of Administrative and Technical Considerations." American Archivist, v. 60, n. 3/4, pp. 330-343. Also available in Encoded Archival Description: Context, Theory, and Case Studies, pp. 66-80. In course e-reserves.
- Ruth, Janice E. (Summer 1997). "Encoded Archival Description: A Structural Overview," American Archivist, v. 60, n. 3/4, pp. 310-329. Also available in Encoded Archival Description: Context, Theory, and Case Studies, pp. 47-66. In course e-reserves.
- Meissner, Dennis. (Summer 1997). "First Things First: Reengineering Finding Aids for Implementation of EAD." American Archivist, v. 60, n. 3/4, pp. 372-387. Also available in Encoded Archival Description: Context, Theory, and Case Studies. In course e-reserves.
- EAD Application Guidelines, Section 3.5.2.4. Physical Location and Container Information. (No journal entry required)
Recommended readings:
- Redding, Clay. (2002). "Reengineering Finding Aids Revisited: Current Archival Descriptive Practice and Its Effect on EAD Implementation," The Journal of Archival Organization, v. 1, n. 3, pp. 35-50.
- Thurman, Alexander C. (2005). "Metadata standards for archival control: an introduction to EAD and EAC." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v. 40, n. 3/4, pp 183-212.
Session 3: Best Practices, Who's Doing What How? (May 20)
Topics covered:
- Need for best practices
- Review of some best practices documentation
- Best practice validation services
In-class exercises:
- Finding aid 1: encode <eadheader> and <frontmatter>
Assignments:
- Journal entry for Week 4 required readings
- Finding aid 2: encode <eadheader> and <frontmatter>
- Finding aid 3: encode <eadheader> and <frontmatter>
Required readings:
- RLG Best Practice Guidelines for Encoded Archival Description, August 2002 (no journal entry required)
- OAC Best Practice Guidelines for Encoded Archival Description, February 2005 (no journal entry required)
- Frost, Hannah C. (2002). "Guidelines Counseling: A Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of EAD Implementation Guidelines, Journal of Archival Organization, v. 1, n. 3, pp. 73-86. IU Libraries online subscription.
- Stockting, Bill. (2004). "Time to Settle Down? EAD Encoding Principles in the Access to Archives Programme (A2A) and the Research Libraries Group's Best Practices," The Journal of Archival Organization, v. 2, n. 3, pp. 7-24. IU Libraries online subscription.
Recommended readings:
- Wisser, Katherine M. and Jennifer O'Brien Roper. (April 2003). "Maximizing Metadata: Exploring the EAD-MARC Relationship." Library Resources and Technical Services v. 47, n. 2, pp. 71-76.
- Fox, Michael J. (2001). "Stargazing: locating EAD in the descriptive firmament." Journal of Internet Cataloging v. 4, n. 3/4, pp. 61-74.
Session 4: Archival Workflows and Publishing EAD (May 27)
Topics covered:
- EAD and archival reference (Guest lecturer: Dina Kellams, University Archives)
- Incorporating EAD into archival processing workflow (Guest lecturer: Dina Kellams, University Archives)
- XSLT and the EAD Cookbook
- XML delivery and search systems
In-class exercises:
- Testing the stylesheets from the EAD Cookbook
Assignments:
- Journal entry for Week 5 required readings
- Finding aid 4: encode <dsc>
Required readings:
- Szary, Richard V. (2001). "Encoded finding aids as a transforming technology in archival reference service." Journal of Internet Cataloging, v. 4, n. 3/4, pp. 187-197. IU Libraries online subscription.
- Greene, Mark A. and Dennis Meissner. (2005). "More product, less process: pragmatically revamping traditional processing approaches to deal with late 20th-century collections." American Archivist, v. 68, n. 2, pp. 208-263.
- Gilliland-Swetland, Anne J. (2001). "Popularizing the finding aid: exploiting EAD to enhance online discovery and retrieval in archival information systems by diverse user groups." Journal of Internet Cataloging, v. 4, n. 3/4, pp. 199-225. IU Libraries online subscription.
- EAD2002 Cookbook (no journal entry required)
Recommended readings:
- Clavaud, Florence and Martin Sévigny. (2005). "Controlling the production of EAD encoded documents, extracting metadata and publishing them on the web: methods and tools, France." Journal of Archival Organization, v. 3, n. 2/3, pp. 147-169.
- Kim, Jihyun. (2004). "EAD Encoding and Display: A Content Analysis," Journal of Archival Organization, v. 2, n. 3, pp. 41-55.
- Prom, Christopher J. (2001). "Extending the capabilities of the EAD Cookbook." OCLC Systems & Services v. 17, no. 2, pp. 89-95.
Session 5: EAD Collaboratively (June 3)
Topics covered:
- Benefits of collaboration
- EAD for user needs
- Balancing local needs with the need for consistency
- Technical means of sharing EAD files
In-class exercises:
- Small group analysis of an EAD consortium, in preparation for Week 6 presentation
Assignments:
- Journal entry for Week 5 required readings
- Capstone writing assignment
- Prepare for small group EAD consortium presentation next week
- Finding aid 4: encode <eadheader>, <frontmatter>, and <archdesc>
Required readings:
- Hill, Amanda, Bill Stockting, and Sarah Higgins. (2005). "Different Strokes for Different Folks: Presenting EAD in Three UK Online Catalogues." Journal of Archival Organization, v. 3, n. 2/3, pp. 183-206. IU Libraries online subscription.
- Brown, Charlotte B. and Brian E. C. Schottlaender. (2001). "The Online Archive of California: A Consortial Approach to Encoded Archival Description." Journal of Internet Cataloging, v. 4, n. 3/4, pp. 97-112. IU Libraries online subscription.
- Prom, Christopher J. (2003). "Reengineering archival access through the OAI protocols." Library Hi Tech, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 199-209. IU Libraries online subscription.
Recommended readings:
- Smith, MacKenzie. (2000). "DFAS: The distributed finding aid search system." D-Lib Magazine 6 (1).
- Hoyer, Timothy P., Stephen Miller, and Alvin Pollock. (2001). "Consortial approaches to the implementation of Encoded Archival Description (EAD): the American Heritage Virtual Archive Project and the Online Archive of California (OAC)." Journal of Internet Cataloging, v. 4, n. 3/4, pp. 113-136.
- Prom, Christopher J. (2002). "Does EAD play well with other metadata standards?" Journal of Archival Organization, v. 1, n. 3, pp 51-72. IU Libraries online subscription.
Session 6: Future Trends in EAD (June 10)
Topics covered:
- EAD and digitized collections
- EAD linking elements
- Encoded Archival Context
- "Next generation" finding aids
In-class exercises:
- Group presentations on EAD Consortia
Required readings:
- Pitti, Daniel V. (2004). "Creator Description: Encoded Archival Context." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, v. 38, n. 3/4, pp 201-226. IU Libraries online subscription.
- Yakel, Elizabeth, Seth Shaw, and Polly Reynolds. (2007). "Creating the next generation of archival finding aids." D-Lib Magazine, v. 13, n. 5/6.
- Light, Michelle and Tom Hyry. (2002). "Colophons and annotations: new directions for the finding aid." American Archivist, v. 65, n. 2, pp. 216-230.
- Evans, Max. J. (2007). "Archives of the people, by the people, for the people." American Archivist, v. 70, n. 1, pp. 387-400.
Recommended readings:
- Szary, Richard V. (2005). "Encoded Archival Context (EAC) and Archival Description: Rationale and Background." Journal of Archival Organization, v. 3, n. 2/3, pp. 217-227.
- Coats, Lisa R., (2004). "Users of EAD Finding Aids: Who Are They and Are They Satisfied?" Journal of Archival Organization, v. 2, n. 3, pp. 25-39.